Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 89025 (MAD)

KARUPPASAMY R v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP(MD)/3963/2022 · 2026-01-05

K Surender

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.3963 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :05.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER W.P.(MD)No.3963 of 2022 and WMP(MD) NO.3404 of 2022 Karuppasamy R ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Madurai .Madurai District .. 2. The Thasildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. 3. The Block Development Officer, T.Kallupatti Panchayat Union, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER :-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from acquiring the petitioner`s agricultural land in punjai Survey No. 163/4B1 a total extent of 2 Acres 21 Cents and Survey No. 371/1B1 a total extent of 50 at Silarpatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District without following any due process of law and the same. For Petitioner :Mr.D.Selvanayagam For Respondents :Mr.R.Ragavendran for R1 and R2 Government Advocate Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan for R3 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.3963 of 2022 O R D E R This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to forbear the respondents from acquiring the petitioner's agricultural land in punjai Survey No. 163/4B1 a total extent of 2 Acres 21 Cents and Survey No. 371/1B1 a total extent of 50 at Silarpatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District without following any due process of law and the same. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents. . 3. The petitioner is the absolute owner of the aforementioned property. Patta also stands in his name. However, without following due process of law, the third respondent is attempting to lay a road in the said properties. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed. 4. Learned Government Advocate, appearing for the official respondents, submits that no road is laid as of now. 5. In view of the above submissions, this writ petition is disposed 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.3963 of 2022 of with an observation that if there are any such proposals for laying the road, it will be subject to acquisition in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (K.SURENDER, J) 05.01.2026 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No RR To 1. The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District. 2. The Thasildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. 3. The Block Development Office, T. Kallupatti Panchayat Union, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.3963 of 2022 K.SURENDER, J. RR W.P.(MD)No.3963 of 2022 05.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis