Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10231 WP No. 32809 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 32809 OF 2025 (GM-AC) BETWEEN:
THE BRANCH MANAGER SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, 3RD FLOOR, KHADI BHAVAN, OPP. TO HEAD POST OFFICE, OLD CITY BUS STAND ROAD, HASSAN, NOW REP. BY M/S.SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO.5/4, 3RD FLOOR, S.V.R. ARCADE BINALAKALLI MAIN ROAD, BILEKAHALI OF B.G.ROAD, IIMB POST, BANGALORE-76 REP. BY ITS MANAGER LEGAL
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. B C SHIVANNE GOWDA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT FATHIMA BI W/O LATE S.M. NASEER AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O NEHRU CIRCLE, BELUR
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10231 WP No. 32809 of 2025
NOW R/AT CHIKKAGOUJA VILLAGE HIREGOUJA POST, LAKYA HOBLI CHIKMAGALURU TALUK - 577 102
2. SR. SYED LLIYAZ S/O SYED YOUSUFF R/O NEHRUNAGAR, BELUR TOWN - 577 102 HASSAN DISTRICT
…RESPONDENTS
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS DATED 27.01.2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT CHIKKAMAGALURU IN MVC NO.87/2023 AT ANNEXURE-F ON THE APPLICATION FIELD ORDER VII RULE 11(d) R/W 151 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AT ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10231 WP No. 32809 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
This petition is by the Insurer who is called upon to answer a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [for short, 'the Act'] in the claim petition in MVC No.87/2023 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chikkamagaluru [for short, 'the Tribunal']. The petitioner has filed an application under Order VII Rule 11[d] read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 contending that the claim petition cannot be entertained because it is filed beyond six months from the date of accident. The Tribunal, by the impugned order dated 27.01.2024, has rejected the petitioner’s application.
The question: whether a claim petition filed beyond six months from the date of the accident can be entertained is pending with the Apex Court in SLP Nos.8412-8413/2023 and similar matters in the writ petition in WP [Civil] No. 166/2024 and connected
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10231 WP No. 32809 of 2025
matters. It remains undisputed that the Apex Court by its interim order dated 16.12.2025 has observed that the pendency of the writ petitions/special leave petitions before it shall not come in the way of the claim petitions being adjudicated by the Tribunals but with the stipulation that judgments shall not be finalized. This Court is of the considered view that with the afore-stipulation, this petition must be disposed of observing that the Tribunal's impugned order will be subject to the outcome in the pending matters before the Apex Court. With this arrangement, the inquiry into the merits of the claim petition will continue, but the Tribunal will refrain from pronouncing its judgment and award so that the decision on the merit of the claim petition otherwise will be subject to the Apex Court’s decision on the afore question. - 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10231 WP No. 32809 of 2025
The petition stands disposed of accordingly. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
NV List No.: 4 Sl No.: 68