HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33831 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Neeja Srivastava, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Sonu Yadav to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 110 of 2026, under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 118(1), 109(1) of BNS, P.S.- Jangipur, District- Ghazipur, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in FIR dated 02.06.2026 lodged by the father of injured with the allegation against seven named including the accused applicant and some anonymous persons that there was an assault on his son Arun while the accused applicant and other accused persons were in coaching. It is further contended that medico legal injury report shows five injuries on the persons of injured wherein x-ray advised for all the injuries. The supplementary report shows no abnormality, which is affirmed in NCCT head. The weapon used was lathi danda. No specific role is assigned on the accused applicant. All the persons have been assigned general role. The applicant has criminal history of one case wherein he is on bail. The charge sheet is submitted. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 29.07.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State opposed the bail application. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeja Srivastava, Rajan Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sonu Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the nature and number of injuries and the corresponding number of accused, no specific role is assigned to the accused applicant, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 23, 2026 Sharad/- BAIL No. 33831 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad