Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8896 (CAL)

MADHAB SAHA v. RANJIT KUMAR SARKAR AND ORS

CO/3843/2024 · 2026-03-24

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24.03.2026 Item No.2 Ct. No. 30 Aloke CO 3843 of 2024 Madhab Saha Vs Ranjit Kumar Sarkar & Ors. Mr. Nilendra Narayan Ray … for the petitioner Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed a written instruction wherein it appears that the petitioner has informed the learned counsel that he does not wish to proceed with the present revisional application. Let the instruction be kept with the record. Considering the submission of the petitioner, the civil revision is disposed of as ‘withdrawn’. Connected application, if any, stands disposed of. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)