IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19751 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2025 Thana- AURAI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1. Ramashish Mahto @ Bullee Mahto Son of Chhedari Mahto Resident of Village- Prem Nagar Bhalura, P.S.- Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur. 2. Chandan Mahto son of Ramashish Mahto Resident of Village- Prem Nagar Bhalura, P.S.- Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Prabhakar Nath Rai, Advocate Mr. Sumit Kumar Srivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 25-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 118(1), 324(2), 109, 352(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner no. 2 has assaulted with dabia on the head of the Dinesh Mahto and the petitioner no. 1 has assaulted with dabia on the head of informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19751 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is also a counter version of this case. From perusal of the order of the learned trial court, it is clear that the nature of injury is simple. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, they are languishing in judicial custody since 13.11.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No. 237 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (East), Muzaffarpur. shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T