Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8894 (RAJ)

SMT. PRIYANKA NARAWAT W/O SHRI ANIL NARAWAT v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7924/2026 · 2026-06-19

Ravi Chirania V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23430] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7924/2026 Smt. Priyanka Narawat W/o Shri Anil Narawat, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Sansi Basti Bhagwan Ganj At Present Purani Chandmari Paharganj, Police Station Ramganj, Distt. Ajmer. (At Present Petitioner In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 19/06/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Smt. Priyanka Narawat W/o Shri Anil Narawat, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.96/2026 dated 09.04.2026 registered at Police Station Ramganj, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that alleged contraband substance (smack) recovered quantified as 6 grams which is less than commercial quantity as prescribed under the Act. Learned counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents against him including under the NDPS Act, 1985. He further submits that Police, after conducting the investigation, has [2026:RJ-JP:23430] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7924/2026] filed the charge-sheet, no further judicial custody is required. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, but could not dispute the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 4. Considering the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner of any nature and contraband substance as recovered is below the commercial quantity, without making any comments on the merits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the present petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, the instant bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Smt. Priyanka Narawat W/o Shri Anil Narawat shall be released on bail, provided he execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. 6. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observations as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect trial of the case. The petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned SHO of the Police Station twice a month for the entire period of the trial. The SHO shall maintain register to mark presence of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fail to appear twice in any month then the same shall be considered as [2026:RJ-JP:23430] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7924/2026] breach and the bail shall stands canceled automatically without further reference to the Court. 7. It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case of NDPS Act during pendency of the trial, this bail shall stands cancelled without further reference to this Court. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 126/RAHUL KUMAR