KARAN BEDIA ALIAS FUNTUSH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./683/2026 · 2026-02-26
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8892 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8892 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:5718] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.683 of 2026
------ Karan Bedia @ Funtush, aged about 36 years, son of Ramu Bedia @ Ramu Mahato, resident of Beldih Basti, Near Hari Mandir, Adityapur, P.O. and P.S. Adityapur, District- Seraikella Kharsawan
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Mohua Palit, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 26-02-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection Adityapur P.S. Case No.215 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-B) (a)/ 26 (1)/35 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner supplied arms and ammunitions for commission of an offence. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the alleged country-made pistol and three cartridges have been recovered from the possession of the co- accused namely Mansingh Murmu who has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.11.2024 passed in B.A. No.9729 of 2024. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any other witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.08.2025 as has been mentioned in para-09 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.215 of 2024 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any other witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-26.02.2026-Animesh/