[2026:RJ-JP:23401] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9161/2026 Lokendra Urf Lokesh Urf Buliya Son of Shri Omprakash, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Chara Ka Bas Tan Parasrampura, Police Station Gothada, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9162/2026 Pankaj S/o Sh. Harphool Singh, aged about 24 Years, R/o Khedadon ki Dhani, Tan Kolsia, Police Station Nawalgarh, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (Presently Confined in District Jail, Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9508/2026 Yogesh Kumar @ Buliya S/o Rajendra Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Chara Ka Baas Tan Parasrampura, P.S. Gothara, District Jhunjhunu, Raj. (Presently Confined At District Jail, Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain, Mr. Neeraj Joshi Mr. Rishi Kant & Ms. Beena Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. with Ms. Neha Goyal [2026:RJ-JP:23401] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9161/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 19/06/2026 1. These misc. bail applications have been filed by the petitioners Lokendra Urf Lokesh Urf Buliya S/o Shri Omprakash, Pankaj S/o Sh. Harphool Singh & Yogesh Kumar @ Buliya S/o Rajendra Singh, who were arrested by the Police in connection with the FIR bearing No.75/2026 dated 05.05.2026, registered at Police Station Gothara, District Jhunjhunu for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2)(m), 351(2), 61(2) and 308(2) B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel submits that the bail applications filed by the petitioners were rejected by the learned Session Judge, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) vide order dated 02.06.2026, thereafter, the petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel submits that the FIR was registered in respect of the incident which took place on 01.01.2024 and was reported on 01.01.2026. Learned counsel further submits that the complete allegations levelled against the petitioners are false and baseless and further, they have not committed any sexual offence as alleged by the complainant in the FIR. Learned counsel further submits that as per contents of the FIR, the offence alleged to have occurred 2-3 years back, however, no such incident was reported at that time. Learned counsel also submits that no photographs or videos as alleged in the impugned FIR were recovered during the investigation by Police, which further shows [2026:RJ-JP:23401] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9161/2026] that no such incriminating evidence is there and the same establishes that the complete evidence is false and baseless. Learned counsel submits that the investigation is almost complete and charge-sheet will be filed soon. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the accused-petitioners be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application by stating that the complainant has specifically named certain persons including the petitioners herein in the FIR and therefore, their conduct is serious in nature. In view thereof, learned Public Prosecutor prays that the accused-petitioners may not be enlarged on bail. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. 6. This Court considered the fact that the alleged incident occurred for the first time on 01.01.2024, however, for a period of two to two and half years, no such incident was reported to the Police by the complainant, who is a female aged about 23 years and as per contents of the complete investigation as placed on record, perused by this Court, she went with different persons at different places and stayed with them in various hotels and other places. The facts as noted by this Court shows that she on her own went with several persons, which is reflected as per the investigation conducted by the Investigating Officer. 7. Considering the nature of allegation, serious delay of two to three years in lodging of the FIR and the fact that no photographs or videos were recovered by the Police, the police after conducting the investigation has filed the charge-sheet, which further reveals that the complete case prima-facie does not inspire any [2026:RJ-JP:23401] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9161/2026] confidence in the story of the prosecution and without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 8. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners Lokendra Urf Lokesh Urf Buliya S/o Shri Omprakash, Pankaj S/o Sh. Harphool Singh and Yogesh Kumar @ Buliya S/o Rajendra Singh, shall be released on bail, provided each of them execute a personal bond in a sum of ₹1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of ₹50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. 9. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail applications will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 312/Monika