STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. URMILA AGRAWAL W/O VINIT KUMAR AGRAWAL
WRES/119/2026 · 2026-06-29
Rekha Borana
Review Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8886 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8886 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:23664] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 119/2026
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Near 22 Godam, Jaipur.
3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Ajmer.
4. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Kherwad, Udaipur ----Petitioners Versus
1. Urmila Agrawal W/o Vinit Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Dageshwar Colony, Phaisagar Road, Ajmer Presently Working At Social Welfare Hostel, Kotda, Ajmer.
2. 3. 4.
2. Tulsi Devi Wife Of Dhula, Resident Of Badla, Udaipur, Presently Working At Government Ambedkar Hostel, Kherwad, District Udaipur.
3. Shanti W/o Devi Gurjar, Resident Of Masuda, Presently Working At Social Welfare Hostel, Masuda, Ajmer.
4. Nirmala Sharma W/o Ghanshyam, Resident Of Kajipura, Phaisagar Road, Near Lalit Motor, Presently Working At Social Welfare Hostel, Kotda, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitosh Pareek HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order 29/06/2026
1. The present restoration application has been filed aggrieved of order dated 10.10.2025 passed in S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No.95/2025.
[2026:RJ-JP:23664] (2 of 2) [WRES-119/2026]
2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that because of his health issue, he could not appear on the said date.
3. The submission as made by counsel seems to be genuine and hence, the present restoration application is allowed. Let the review petition be restored to its original number.
(REKHA BORANA),J 24-/KashishS