[2026:RJ-JP:23276] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8503/2026 Vishnu Gurjar S/o Jatan Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Bathua Ka Nagla, Thana Kathumar, District Alwar. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9137/2026 Zahid Son Of Majlis, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Gulmani, PS Sikri, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 16/06/2026 1. The instant bail applications have been filed by the petitioners Vishnu Gurjar S/o Jatan Singh and Zahid S/o Majlis, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.116/2026 dated 03.04.2026 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg. [2026:RJ-JP:23276] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8503/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that police after conducting the investigation has filed the charge-sheet on 02.06.2026 and no further recovery and interrogation is required to be made from the petitioners herein. He further submits that as far as the accused petitioner Vishnu Gurjar is concerned, there are no criminal antecedent of any nature against him, and with respect to the petitioner Zahid, there is one criminal antecedent of the year 2025 registered under the Arms Act, 1959 in which, as informed, he has already been enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant oppose the bail applications by submitting that the conduct of the petitioner Zahid is serious in nature and he does not deserves to be enlarged on bail, however, they seriously failed to oppose the bail application of the accused Vishnu Gurjar. 4. This Court considered the fact that police after conducting the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet and trial will take sufficient long time. This Court further considered the arguments as raised and noted that the criminal antecedents are only against the accused Zahid, in which he has already been enlarged on bail. 5. Be that as it may 6. Without making any comments on the merits of the case and considering the fact that the trial will take sufficient long time, this Court is inclined to enlarge the present petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners Vishnu Gurjar S/o Jatan Singh and Zahid S/o Majlis shall be released on bail, provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of [2026:RJ-JP:23276] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8503/2026] Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. 8. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 9. As the petitioner Zahid has one criminal antecedent registered under the Arms Act, 1959, in case he is found to be involved in any other case of similar nature during the pendency of trial, this bail shall stand cancelled without any reference to this Court. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 169-170-s/Dushyant