Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8882 (UTT)

SHALINI v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WPCRL/1358/2026 · 2026-07-24

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010124062026 2026:UHC:6347 UKHC010124062026 WPCRL/1358/2026 Shalini --Petitioner Versus Senior Superintendent of Police --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. Mr. Aarav Singh, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Avidit Noliyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. The instant petition is moved for a limited purpose that despite the first information report, there is no progress in the investigation, and even the statement of the petitioner is not being recorded. It is alleged in the FIR that there are some people, who are creating nuisance in front of the house of the petitioner/victim. 4. The Investigating Officer who joined proceedings through VC apprised that the investigation is going on, and since she was busy in VIP duty and she gives another date of 25.07.2026 to the husband of the victim for recording her statement under Section 164 of CrPC. The Investigating Officer assures to this Court that she will conduct the investigation in a very fair and transparent manner and will take the appropriate action against erring persons. 5. Subject to the observation and the direction and assurance as given by the Investigating Officer, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 24.07.2026 Nitesh/