Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8882 (BOM)

ROHIT GAUTAM SALVI v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/2621/2026 · 2026-09-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

KVM 1/1 902 - ABA 2621 OF 2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2621/2026 ROHIT GAUTAM SALVI ….. APPLICANT VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….. RESPONDENT Adv. Parimal Wagh (Thr. V.C.) a/w. Adv. Neha Pawar i/b. Adv. Pavan Ghatkar for the Applicant. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the Respondent – State. ASI Gururaj J. Nalage, Chunabhatti Police Station, Mumbai present. CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C. :- 1) After the learned APP pointed out that the applicant has not disclosed all the criminal antecedents on affidavit in this application, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the instant application with liberty to file a fresh application by disclosing all the criminal antecedents as required by the judgment of Supreme Court in the matter of Zeba Khan vs. State of U.P., 2026 SCC OnLine SC 188. 2) Accordingly, application is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. [PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.] KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Digitally signed by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2026.09.18 14:38:18 +0530