Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8881 (BOM)

PRAKASH HIRALAL MISTRY AND ANOTHER v. MS Aditya Developers

IA/7095/2026 · 2026-09-16

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20 SA(ST)-17823-26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 17823 OF 2026 Prakash Hiralal Mistry & anr. ..Appellants Versus M/s. Aditya Developers & ors. …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7144 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 17823 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7095 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 17823 OF 2026 WITH SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 17824 OF 2026 Mukesh Hiralal Mistry & anr. ..Appellants Versus M/s. Aditya Developers & ors. …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7145 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 17824 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7096 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 17824 OF 2026 Mr. Shekhar Jagtap, i/b J Shekhar Associates, for the Appellants/applicants. Mr. Floyd Francis Mariano Gracias, for Respondent No.3. SAINATH, PA 1/2 SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Digitally signed by SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Date: 2026.09.17 12:06:09 +0530 20 SA(ST)-17823-26.DOC CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.: IA/7095/2026 & IA/7096/2026 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. These applications are for condonation of delay in preferring the Second Appeals. 3. The delay is of 2 days only. 4. Having regard to the short period of delay and the reasons assigned in the application and to advance the cause of substantive justice, the delay in preferring the Second Appeals deserves to be condoned. 5. The IA/7095/2026 and IA/7096/2026 stand allowed. 6. The delay in preferring the Second Appeals stands condoned. 7. The SA(ST)/17823/2026 and SA(ST)/17824/2026 be registered and listed for admission on 23rd September, 2026. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] SAINATH, PA 2/2