[2026:RJ-JP:23280] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8366/2026 Brijraj Singh S/o Sh. Uday Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Roopwas, P.S. Banetha, Tonk. (Accused/petitioner Confined In The District Jail Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atul Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 16/06/2026 1. The present criminal misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Brijraj Singh S/o Sh. Uday Singh, aged about 55 Years, who was arrested by the police on 11.05.2026 in connection with the FIR bearing No.80/2026 dated 11.05.2026 registered at Police Station Banetha, District Tonk for the offence punishable under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the learned Additional Session Judge, Uniyara, District Tonk, vide order dated 19.05.2026, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel submits that the Police has shown recovery of weapons i.e. Pistol and Air Gun along-with plastic bags containing gun-powder from the petitioner. Learned counsel [2026:RJ-JP:23280] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8366/2026] further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents in the recent past except one case of the year 1994, in which he was punished with fine. Learned counsel further submits that the complete allegation as mentioned in the FIR prima-facie appears to be concocted and creates a doubt about the story created by the Police. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the petitioner be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, however, could not dispute the fact that only on random checking, the alleged weapons were recovered. 5. Be that as it may. 6. This Court, after considering the nature of allegations, trial will take sufficiently long time, petitioner is behind the bars since 11.05.2026, and the petitioner has been arrested only on the basis of random checking by which the alleged weapons have been found and after considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Brijraj Singh S/o Sh. Uday Singh shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. [2026:RJ-JP:23280] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8366/2026] 8. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 9. It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case within two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 38/Monika