Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8877 (JHR)

AMBIKA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./3738/2025 · 2026-04-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:11601 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3738 of 2025 ------ 1. Ambika Yadav, aged about 54 years, Son of Rambali Yadav, resident of Amrasota, Punjabi More, Searsole, Rajbari, P.O. & P.S.- Raniganj, District Bardhman (West Bengal). 2. Virendra Dixit, aged about 49 years, son of Dhuni Dixit, resident of Ramkrishna Colony, Searsole, Rajbari, P.O. & P.S.-Raniganj, District Bardhman (West Bengal). 3. Munshi Yadav, aged about 53 years, son of Bhikhan Yadav, resident of Ramkrishna Colony, Searsole, Rajbari, P.O. & P.S.- Raniganj, District Bardhman (West Bengal). .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.04 Dated- 20-04-2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this criminal miscellaneous petition as the petitioners were on bail and they are not affected by the impugned order as in the impugned order, non-bailable warrant of arrest has been directed to be issued against the persons who are not on bail. Permission is accorded. This criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 20/04/2026 Abhiraj/