[2026:RJ-JP:23544] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7952/2026 Suresh Kumar @ Roxy S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Laxmi Vihar Gali No. 2, P.s. Railway Colony, Kota. (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI (V.J.) Order 24/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the accused – applicant by invoking the provisions of Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, the requisite details of which are as under:- Sr. No. Particulars 1 FIR No. and Date 62/2023 dated 14.02.2023 2 Concerned Police Station Bhimganj Mandi, District Kota, City, Raj. 3 Offences as alleged in the FIR under Sections 341, 323, 307, 143 IPC. 4 Date of Arrest 12.05.2026 2. Learned counsel for the accused – applicant submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this matter and he is a young boy and is not a habitual offender. Learned counsel further submits that due to an unintentional and bonafide communication gap, the accused-applicant could not appear on the dates fixed before the learned Trial Court and as such, on 05.03.2026 his bail [2026:RJ-JP:23544] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7952/2026] bonds were forfeited and warrant of arrest was issued. Learned counsel further submits that there no other offence(s) was committed by the accused-applicant during the said period when he was not in custody and even in compliance of the directions of the learned Trial Court, the accused-applicant has duly deposited the ordered fine amount of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) on 21.05.2026, a copy of acknowledgment slip of the same has been submitted before this Court, which is taken on record. Learned counsel further submits that the accused-applicant is in custody since 12.05.2026 and he is ready to abide by all the conditions and face the trial and he undertakes to appear on each and every date as fixed before the learned Trial Court and he shall not make any attempt to jump the bail again. Hence, learned counsel prays that the accused-applicant be granted bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the averments made by learned counsel for the accused - applicant. 5. Considering the submissions put-forth by learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the present case and also the considering the facts that accused- applicant is in custody since 12.05.2026; fine of Rs.5,000/- has been deposited on 21.05.2026 as well as undertaking of the learned counsel on behalf of the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant shall appear on each and every date a fixed by the learned Trial Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused – applicant on bail. 6. Consequently, the present bail application is allowed and the accused – applicant– Suresh Kumar @ Roxy S/o Mohanlal [2026:RJ-JP:23544] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7952/2026] arrested in connection with the above-mentioned FIR be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case upon furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of the same amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the learned trial Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial. 7. Additionally, the accused – applicant will also remain bound by the following conditions:- (i) The accused – applicant shall not leave the country without seeking prior permission of the learned trial Court; (ii) The accused – applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence(s) of which he stands accused of and in the event, the accused – applicant is found to be involved in any other similar case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein; (iii) The accused – applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer/investigating authority; (iv) The accused – applicant shall not tamper with any evidence nor would influence any witnesses in the case; and (ANUROOP SINGHI (V.J.)),J Upendra Pratap Singh/27