[2026:RJ-JP:23375] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8329/2026 Shoraj Singh S/o Lala Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Roopwas Police Station Banetha, District Tonk. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Tonk (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 18/06/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Shoraj Singh S/o Lala Singh, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.79/2026 registered at Police Station Banetha, District Tonk for the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents except for one case under the NDPS Act of the year 2024. He further submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated as he has not committed any such offence. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application. 4. This Court, considering the nature of allegations, previous criminal antecedents against the petitioner which shows that only [2026:RJ-JP:23375] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8329/2026] one case of NDPS Act was registered against him, in which he is on bail and without making any comments on the merits/demerits of the case, is inclined to enlarge the present petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, the instant bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Shoraj Singh S/o Lala Singh shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. 6. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observations as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect trial of the case. The petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned SHO of the Police Station twice a month for the entire period of the trial. The SHO shall maintain register to mark presence of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fail to appear twice in any month then the same shall be considered as breach and the bail shall stands cancelled without further reference to this Court. 7. It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case of Arms Act during pendency of the trial, learned Public Prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 124/RAHUL KUMAR