[2026:RJ-JP:23435] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8778/2026 Prerna Kumari W/o Vijendra Kumar Sansi, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Anatpura, Police Station Amarsar, District Jaipur Ru- ral, currently Residing At House Number 34, Mahalaxmi Nagar, Gajsinghpura, Police Station Shyam Nagar, Jaipur South. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 19/06/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Prerna Kumari W/o Vijendra Kumar Sansi, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.260/2026 dated 27.05.2026 registered at Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South), for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21, 8/23 of the NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the learned Special Judge, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Jaipur Metropolitan-I vide order dated 01.06.2026, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S, 2023. [2026:RJ-JP:23435] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8778/2026] 3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is a female and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the contraband substance (smack) recovered from her possession is 27 gms, which is below the commercial quantity, i.e., 250 gms. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has two criminal antecedents under the NDPS Act. It is also submitted that the petitioner is a pregnant lady and medical care is required for the child in the womb. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application. 5. After considering the fact that the alleged contraband substance is less than the commercial quantity and the petitioner is 6-7 months pregnant and requires medical attention, trial will take sufficiently long time and without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Prerna Kumari W/o Vijendra Kumar Sansi shall be released on bail, provided she executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for her appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. 7. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the [2026:RJ-JP:23435] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8778/2026] observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 8. It is further directed that in case, if the petitioner is found to be involved in any case including NDPS Act within a period two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 167/RINCHU