Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:23293] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9169/2026
1. Kayyum S/o Ibrahim, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Kanchanner, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg.
2. Parvej S/o Aasarman, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Aminabad, Police Station Bichhor, District Nuh, Haryana. (At present accused petitioners confined in Sub Jail Deeg) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through P. P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9170/2026 Taslim S/o Ali Mohammad, Age 21 Years, R/o Village Luhinga Kalan, Police Station Punhana District Nuh (Haryana) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh Mr. Surendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)
Order 16/06/2026
1. These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners Kayyum S/o Ibrahim, Parvej S/o Aasarman & Taslim S/o Ali Mohammad, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.0173/2026 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) 340(2) 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313 and 61(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 66-D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The bail applications of the petitioners were rejected by the learned Additional District and Sessions
[2026:RJ-JP:23293] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9169/2026] Judge Kaman, District Deeg vide order dated 01.06.2026, thereafter, the petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023.
2.
Learned counsel submits that the impugned FIR shows that no serious allegations has been levelled against them. Learned counsel further submits that there are no complaint against the petitioners on ‘1930’ portal, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and they have falsely been implicated in this case. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the accused- petitioners be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application. 4. This Court, after considering the nature of allegations as reported in the FIR, the fact that there are no previous case of similar nature, the overall facts and circumstances and without commenting upon merits of the matter, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners - Kayyum S/o Ibrahim, Parvej S/o Aasarman & Taslim S/o Ali Mohammad shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-
1. Each of the accused-petitioners shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs 50,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. [2026:RJ-JP:23293] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9169/2026]
2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused-petitioners shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: - (i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused- petitioners have in their name. (ii) The accused-petitioners shall submit complete transaction statements of all of their active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO. 3. The accused shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer. 4. The accused-petitioners shall surrender his passport, if they have, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court. 5. The accused-petitioners shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO. 6.
The accused-petitioners shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order. [2026:RJ-JP:23293] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9169/2026]
7. The accused-petitioners shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners. 8. The accused-petitioners shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer. 9. The accused-petitioners shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer. 10. In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioners shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. 11. The accused-petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation. 12. The accused-petitioners shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever. 6. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioners are found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 86-86/Manish