Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010113962026
2026:GAU-AS:9101
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1914/2026 LUTHFUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY RETIRED ARABIC TEACHER, BAKRIHAWAR M.E. MADRASSA/SCHOOL, BLOCK HAILAKANDI, DIST HAILAKANDI, ASSAM. MOBILE 7086344835. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI - 781019. 3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER HAILAKANDI P.O. AND DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN - 788151. 4:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN -788151 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T K DEY, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU,
Page No.# 2/4 Linked Case : WP(C)/6203/2024 LUTFUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY RETIRED HEADMASTER BAKRIHAWAR M E SCHOOL VILL.- BAKRIHOWR PART-10 P.O. NORTHNARAINPUR P.S. PANCHGRAM DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER HAILAKANDI P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788151. 4:BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER HAILAKANDI P.O. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788151. ------------ Advocate for : MR. N ISLAM Advocate for : SC ELEM. EDU appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 23.06.2026
1. Heard Mr. T.K. Dey, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel for the Elementary Education department. 2. This present Interlocutory Application has been filed in WP(C) No. 6203/2024, praying for leave to amend the cause title of the writ petition insofar as the petitioner has been described as a retired Headmaster in the cause title only, whereas he should have been described as a retired Arabic teacher. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to the misnomer in the cause title of the writ petition, the respondents have not proceeded to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 14.05.2024 as required by the order dated 27.11.2024. 3. Keeping in view the nature of the relief sought for and also the fair submission of Mr.
B. Talukdar, it is provided that the respondents would proceed to comply with the order dated 27.11.2024 to the extent of disposing of the representation made by the applicant herein/writ petitioner in WP(C) No. 6203/2024 on 14.05.2024, notwithstanding the fact that the petitioner has been described as retired Headmaster in the cause title. 4. I have perused the contents of the writ petition, and it appears that in the body of the writ petition, the petitioner has described himself as a retired Arabic
Page No.# 4/4 teacher, and the description as a retired Headmaster is an inadvertent misnomer. 5. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant