Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 887 (BOM)

SHRI. NAMDEO DAGDU HINGE v. SHRI. RAMCHANDRA LAXMAN VAIRAGAR AND ORS

WP/4282/2021 · 2026-03-04

Shri Sandeep V Marne

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Renuka 3-RPW-70-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 70 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4282 OF 2021 Shri. Namdeo Dagdu Hinge ...Petitioner V/s. Shri. Ramchandra Laxman Vairagar and Ors ...Respondents ________________ Ms. K. S. Mahuli for Petitioner. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 16 JULY 2026. P.C.: 1) By this Petition, the Petitioner seeks review of the order dated 4 March 2026. 2) I have heard Ms. Mahuli, the learned counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner. She submits that the Petitioner may be granted an opportunity to deposit the amount of Rs. 2,000/- in pursuance of the decree. However, upon being queried by this Court as to whether there is any error apparent on face of record in the order dated 4 March 2026, her response is in the negative. She however submits that the Petitioner has a valid justiAcation for not Aling the Petition immediately after passing the order by the District Judge-1, Pune on 19 April 2014. If there was Page No. 1 of 2 16 JULY 2026 2026:BHC-AS:29209 Renuka 3-RPW-70-2026.docx indeed any justiAcation, the same ought to have pleaded in the Petition and in any case brought to the notice of the Court when the Petition was decided on 4 March 2026. The Review Petition is Aled and is argued as if it is an appeal in disguise. There is no error apparent on face of record in the order under review. 3) Review Petition is accordingly rejected. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 16 JULY 2026 Signed by: Renuka S Thakur Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 17/07/2026 12:23:36