Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 887 (ALL)

MATA PRASAD v. SRI SATYENDRA KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

CAPL/2503/2026 · 2026-04-19

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2503 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Applicant before this Court had instituted an Original Suit No.1 of 1999, in which, temporary injunction was granted on 29.01.1999. It is contended that civil suit is still pending and the opposite party has violated the injunction. 2. As the applicant has a remedy of filing an application under Order 39 Rule 2-A of CPC before the Court concerned, no case for contempt is made out. 3. Contempt application is misconceived and the same stands dismissed. April 20, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mata Prasad .....Applicant(s) Sri Satyendra Kumar And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad