HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17475 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State, Sri Dharmendra Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, during the course of investigation, offence under Section 103 of B.N.S., 2023 has been substituted by Section 108 of B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts but states that he does not intend to further press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh with better particulars. 4. Learned AGA for the State as well as learned counsel for the respondent no.4 has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 6. Certified copy of the relevant documents, if any, be returned back to learned counsel for the petitioner as per Rules. September 23, 2026 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Tripathi, Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Laxmi Devi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dharmendra Kumar, G.A. (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Akanksha Devi @ Akanksha Shivhare .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad