[2026:RJ-JP:23417] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5543/2026 Ramphal S/o Birbal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 8 Palota, Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Lodge At Sub Jail Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 19/06/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Ramphal S/o Birbal, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.359/2024 dated 01.12.2024 registered at Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu for the offences pun- ishable under Section 103(1) of B.N.S, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Khetri, Rajasthan, vide order dated 17.09.2025, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the other co-accused, namely Bhajan Lal @ Bhujia, [2026:RJ-JP:23417] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5543/2026] has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.14066/2025 vide order dated 25.03.2026. Learned counsel further submits that though the name of the petitioner finds mention in the FIR, the allegations are prima facie false and baseless. It is also submitted that the statements recorded before the learned Trial Court shows contradictions and the witnesses have failed to attribute any specific role or evidence against the petitioner. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the petitioner be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, however, could not dispute the fact that the other co- accused person has already been enlarged on bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed, the petitioner is behind the bars since long and trial will take its considerable time. Without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Ramphal S/o Birbal shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each [2026:RJ-JP:23417] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5543/2026] and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse the liberty granted by this Court. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 46/RINCHU