SRI KAILASH NATH PANDEY v. DR. RAJ SHEKHAR, MANAGING DIRECTOR (RURAL), U.P. JAL NIGAM, 6, RANA PRATAP MARG
CAPL/4468/2026 · 2026-09-22
Vikas Budhwar
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8864 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8864 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4468 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-compliance of the order dated 21.11.2025 passed in Writ - A No. 17594 of 2025 which required the opposite party to consider the application of the applicant.
3. Today, instructions have been produced by Shri S.K. Om, according to which, the entire payments have been made.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant shall question the quantum before the appropriate forum. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned counsel for the applicant.
5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record, leaving it open for the applicant to question the said order before appropriate forum in accordance with law.
6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as Appendix-A. September 23, 2026 Ashu Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sanjay Kumar Om (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Sri Kailash Nath Pandey .....Applicant(s) Dr. Raj Shekhar, Managing Director (Rural), U.P. Jal Nigam, 6, Rana Pratap Marg .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad