2026:JHHC:8915 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2631 of 2026 Ziaul Ansari @ Jiyaul Ansari @ Ziyaul Haque @ Jiaul Ansari --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Adv. For the O.P. : A.P.P. --- 02/30.03.2026 Heard Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 135/2025. The petitioner is alleged to have abducted the daughter of the informant. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the medical report does not support the factum of rape. It has further been submitted that the victim was in a love affair with the petitioner which could be revealed from the C.D.R. It has further been submitted that there is marked difference between the first information report and the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 of the B.N.S.S. Learned counsel adds that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 11.12.2025. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. It appears from the Section 180 of the B.N.S.S. statement that it was the petitioner who had abducted and 2026:JHHC:8915 established physical relationship with the victim which fact is also consistent with the Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. statement of the victim. The victim is a minor and considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is hereby rejected. This application stands rejected. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated- 30th March, 2026. Amar/- Uploaded on: 02/04/2026.