Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8859 (UTT)

JHANGIR ALI v. NAGAR NIGAM ROORKEE

WPMS/298/2024 · 2026-07-27

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010013052024 2026:UHC:6437 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/297/2024 Jhangir Ali --Petitioner Versus Nagar Nigam Roorkee --Respondent With WPMS No. 298 of 2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. None present for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Lalit Miglani, learned counsel for the respondent-Nagar Nigam Roorkee. 3. Learned counsel appearing for Nagar Nigam Roorkee submits that pursuant to the order passed by Deputy Director Consolidation on 24.07.2024 impugned in these writ petitions, the Settlement Officer Consolidation has decided the mutation application(s) after hearing both the parties. He further submits that the order passed by Settlement Officer Consolidation has not been challenged by any of the parties. He thus submits that in view of subsequent development, the writ petitions may be dismissed as infructuous. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for Nagar Nigam Roorkee, the writ petitions are dismissed, as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 27.07.2026 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.07.27 05:51:47 -07'00'