SHAITAN SINGH S/O TRILOK SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8310/2026 · 2026-06-18
Ravi Chirania V J
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8856 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8856 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:23374] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8310/2026
1. Shaitan Singh S/o Trilok Singh, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Durgawas, Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar - At Present In Judicial Custody At District Jail Beawar
2. Yashpal Singh Son Of Balwant Singh, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Durgawas, Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar - At Present In Judicial Custody At District Jail Beawar ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Sharma for Ms. Bismaad Kaur Saluja For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)
Order 18/06/2026
1. This instant bail application has been filed by the petitioners Shaitan Singh S/o Trilok Singh and Yashpal Singh S/o of Balwant Singh, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.108/2026 registered at Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar for the offences punishable under Section 305(a) of the BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and there are no criminal antecedents of any nature against him. It is further submitted that the petitioner is behind the bars for long and the trial of the case
[2026:RJ-JP:23374] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8310/2026] will take long time to conclude. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application.
4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the
arguments raised by the learned counsels for both the parties and the material available on record, the fact that no recovery is required to be made from the petitioners herein and noting that there are no criminal antecedents against them, this Court, without making any comments on the merits/demerits of the case, is inclined to enlarge the present petitioners on bail.
5. Accordingly, these instant bail applications filed under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is directed that petitioners Shaitan Singh S/o Trilok Singh and Yashpal Singh son of Balwant Singh shall be released on bail, provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
6. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observations as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect trial of the case.
7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the same shall be treated as a violation of this order and further if the accused-petitioners is found to be involved in similar such cases
[2026:RJ-JP:23374] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8310/2026] during pendency of the trial, this bail shall stand cancelled without further reference to this Court.
(RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 122/RAHUL KUMAR