IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22444 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2018 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== Om Prakash Yadav @ Om Prakash Kumar @ Badhu Yadav @ Barhu Yadav, Son of Late Bindeshwar Yadav @ Baleshwar Yadav @ Upadhyay Yadav, Resident of Village -khairuchak Mahiya, P.S -Sakurabad, District -Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shankar Pathak, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 17-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 273 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of I.P.C. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that informant is a driver of a truck and after loading Soyabeans to the tune of 27.380 tone on a trcuk proceeded to its destination from Begusarai. When the truck reached at Pali road at that time one unknown truck bearing 12 wheels overtook and overpowered the truck of the informant. Seven persons came down and boarded in the truck of the informant, snatched his mobile and truck. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22444 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 2/3 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, co-accused Sudhir Kumar and Ranjeet Kumar have given their confessional statement and the name of this petitioner has surfaced in their confessional statement. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. Save and except the confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against him. No T.I.P. has been conducted. It has further been submitted that similarly situated co-accused Ravindra Kumar has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 5005 of 2026. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 08.02.2026. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of seven cases. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22444 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Danapur in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 273 of 2018. lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T