2026:JHHC:4637 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.11019 of 2025 Gobind Hembrom @ Govind Hembrom, aged about 35 years, S/o – Late Mistri Hembrom, R/o Village – Dhandhakiya, P.O + P.S – Muffasil, District - Dumka. …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P --------- 04/Dated: 18 th February, 2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant, who is in custody since 29.05.2025, has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Dumka (M) P.S. Case No.78 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 333/ 109/ 103(1)/ 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Dumka. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that complete set of F.I.R along with its enclosures have been annexed with the present bail application and there is no suppression on his/ her part. Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the fatal assault has been inflicted by the other co-accused and not by this applicant. There is case and counter case. It has further been submitted that charge has already been framed on 11.11.2025. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 4. Learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for bail stating that the crime has been done by the active participation of this applicant also. Thus, the individual accusation is not relevant. 5. Considering the above fact, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the applicant is, hereby, rejected. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 18th February, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 19.02.2026