Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8850 (RAJ)

DHARMVEER S/O BAJRANG LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8364/2026 · 2026-06-19

Ravi Chirania V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23433] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8364/2026 Dharmveer S/o Bajrang Lal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Near Bus Stand Mahamaya Ka Mandir, Khoor, Police Station Losal, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 19/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Dharmveer S/o Bajrang Lal, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.67/2026 dated 10.05.2026 registered at Police Station Gokulpura, District Sikar for the offences punishable under Section 8 read with 18 of the NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel submits that the alleged contraband substance as recovered by the police from the petitioner’s possession is quantified as 100 grams, which is below the commercial quantity (i.e. 2.5 Kilograms, as per the NDPS Act). He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent of any nature including the NDPS Act, therefore, it is apparent that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. In view [2026:RJ-JP:23433] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8364/2026] thereof, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail by this Court. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. This Court, considering the quantity as recovered from the petitioner which is below the commercial quantity as prescribed by the Act, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents including under the NDPS Act and without commenting upon the merits of the case, is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Dharmveer S/o Bajrang Lal shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. 7. It is made clear that the observations as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 8. The petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned SHO of the Police Station twice a month for the entire period of the trial. The SHO shall maintain register to mark presence of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fail to appear twice in any month then the same shall be considered as breach and the bail shall stands canceled automatically without further reference to the Court. [2026:RJ-JP:23433] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8364/2026] 9. In case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case of NDPS Act in future, then this bail shall stand cancelled without further reference to this Court. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 141/Dushyant