Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 885 (RAJ)

ARIF ALI S/O ALI MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3318/2026 · 2026-03-19

Ravi Chirania

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11911] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3318/2026 Arif Ali S/o Ali Mohammad, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kishanpura, Fakirakheda Sarkari School Ke Samne, P.s Ramganj, Ajmer. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Fahad Hasan Mr. Ishan Raj Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 19/03/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Arif Ali S/o Ali Mohammad, aged about 40 Years, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.84/2025 dated 07.03.2025 registered at Police Station Ramganj, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2),189(2), 190, 191(2) of B.N.S. 2023. 2. Learned counsel submitted that the bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the Additional Session Judge No.5, District Ajmer vide order dated 18.02.2026, thereafter, petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. 3. Learned counsel submits that he has falsely been implicated in the present FIR and the other co-accused persons have already [2026:RJ-JP:11911] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3318/2026] been enlarged on bail by allowing their respective bail applications under Sections 483 and 482 B.N.S.S.. 4. Learned counsel further submits that the injuries, as suffered by the injured persons Sameer and Rizwan, have specifically not been attributed to the petitioner. In view thereof, he prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application. 6. This Court considered the nature of the allegations and the fact that the other co-accused persons having similar allegations, have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by allowing their respective bail applications as discussed above. 7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, and maintaining the parity, as also noticing that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail by allowing the present bail application. 8. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Arif Ali S/o Ali Mohammad, shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage or misuse of liberty is granted by this [2026:RJ-JP:11911] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3318/2026] Court. It is made clear that the observations as made by this Court in the bail application, will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Dushyant/51