[2026:RJ-JP:23186] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5546/2026 Yuvraj S/o Amilal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Fatehpura Kalan, Police Station Sarund, District Behror-Kotputli, Rajasthan. (Con- fined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Ola, Mr. Manoj Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP. Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP. Mr. Chinmay Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Order 15/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 18.03.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge No.1, Alwar, in Bail Application No. 309/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No. 51/2026, registered at Police Station-Vaishali Nagar, District Alwar, for the offences under Section 318(4), 303(2), 238(c), 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accuseds have already been enlarged on bail either by the learned Trial Court or by the High Court. He further submits that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time. He also submits that the offences are triable by a [2026:RJ-JP:23186] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5546/2026] Magistrate and that the challan has already been filed. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail, as the accused has been in custody since 27.02.2026. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced as well as the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate, the challan has been filed, the conclusion of trial is likely to take sufficient long time, other co-accuseds have been enlarged on bail and no criminal antecedents against the petitioner this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be allowed. 6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. 6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner namely-Yuvraj S/o Amilal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 51/2026 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Alwar, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/ (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the prior permission of the Court; [2026:RJ-JP:23186] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5546/2026] (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected to have committed; (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person ac- quainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing those facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application be- fore the learned Trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J Seema/17