Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8845 (RAJ)

DILIP S/O LATE HEMSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7091/2026 · 2026-06-16

Ravi Chirania V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23249] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7091/2026 Dilip S/o Late Hemsingh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Hinnoda Ka Pura, Purani Chavni, Police Station Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Virendra Agrawal with Ms. Anjali Assat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 16/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner in connection with FIR bearing No.117/2026 dated 27.02.2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Dholpur for offences punishable under Sections 61(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 229(1) and 248(a) of BNS, 2023, who was involved in filing of false claim case by showing that the alleged incident caused by a vehicle, which was already in police custody at the time of the incident. 2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is behind the bars from 12.04.2026 in connection with the FIR which was registered in respect of the incident dated 30.03.2025. He also submits that no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner and the offences alleged are triable by Magistrate. In [2026:RJ-JP:23249] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7091/2026] view thereof, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail by this Court. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application. 4. This Court, considering the nature of the allegations, the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed, petitioner is behind the bars since 12.04.2026 and the trial will take sufficiently long time to conclude, without making any comments on the merits of the case, is inclined to enlarge the present petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Dilip S/o Late Hemsingh shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. 6. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 7. In case the petitioner is found to be involved in any other case of similar nature. The learned Public Prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 168/Dushyant