[2026:RJ-JP:23194] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6666/2026 Ansar Ahmad S/o Iqbal Khan, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Adarsh Nagar B, Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P, ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kankoriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Paras Jain Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Order 15/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 23.04.2026, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur, in Bail Application No.354/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.138/2026, Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2)(A) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amended) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is only one criminal antecedent under Section 379 IPC and one another complaint on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal against the present petitioner and the total amount involved in the present case is Rs.8,000/-. [2026:RJ-JP:23194] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6666/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that amount was inadvertently deposited in the account of the petitioner, the petitioner has already refunded back the said amount to victim Pooja through the bank transaction I.D. belonging to victim Pooja. He submits that the offences are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that trial is likely to take sufficient long time. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 20.04.2026. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant-Pooja does not dispute the fact of amount has been refunded back by the petitioner to the victim Pooja. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the bail application and submit that there is one another complaint against the petitioner on the NCCRP. 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the complainant, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 7. Without commenting any opinion on merits of the case, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and also the facts that the offences are triable by Magistrate; the victim-Pooja given her affidavit before the Court and also stated through her counsel wherein she has stated that the petitioner has refunded the amount to her which was inadvertently sent to his account; the petitioner has been in custody since 20.04.2026 and trial is likely to take long time to conclude, this Court deems it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:23194] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6666/2026] 8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Ansar Ahmad S/o Iqbal Khan arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.138/2026, Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J 34/PRATEEK KUMAR