Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8844 (ALL)

ANTRIKSH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/20885/2025 · 2026-09-23

Samit Gopal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 20885 of 2025 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Akshay Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Arti Agarwal, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. 3. The present application under Sections 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicant Antriksh Kumar Singh with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the entire proceeding of Session Case No. 883 of 2022 (State Vs. Bharat Singh and others) including cognizance order dated 18.11.2022 arising out of charge sheet No. 59A/22 dated 22.10.2022 in case crime No. 64 of 2022, under Sections 323, 452, 504, 506, 325 I.P.C. and section 3(2)(va) and 3(1)(Da) of S.C./S.T. Act, P.S.- Pakadi, District Ballia, pending in the court of learned Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, Ballia and with a further prayer to stay the further proceedings of the said case. 4. At the very outset learned counsel for the applicant states that the present application U/s 528 BNSS be dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Prayer is allowed. 6. The present application is dismissed as withdrawn. 7. The records do not show of passing any interim order in the matter. 8. Registrar (Compliance) to communicate this order to the trial court concerned within a week. September 24, 2026 M. ARIF Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akshay Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Samit Gopal,J.) Antriksh Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad