[2026:RJ-JP:23285] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8698/2026 Mufid @ Mufi S/o Subba, Age 33 years, R/o Nagla Kulwana, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At present confined in Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. Mr. Vivek Choudhary, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 16/06/2026 1. This criminal misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Mufid @ Mufi S/o Subba, aged about 33 years, who has been arrested after almost 11 years by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.450/2015 dated 22.07.2015 registered at Police Station Kama, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Section 143, 364A & 384 of I.P.C. 1860. The bail application filed by the petitioner herein was rejected by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kama, District Bharatpur, vide order dated 26.05.2026, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and except the present case he has no other criminal antecedants against him. Learned counsel further submits that the other co-accused person namely Rahil has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this [2026:RJ-JP:23285] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8698/2026] Court while allowing his anticipatory bail application vide order dated 23.02.2018 in S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No.1224/2018 titled as Rahil Vs. The State of Rajasthan. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the accused-petitioner be also granted similar benefit and be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application. 4. This Court, after considering the nature of allegations as alleged, investigation has almost completed and no recovery is required to be made form the petitioner, the other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Mufid @ Mufi S/o Subba shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observations as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 51/AMAN