Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8842 (RAJ)

RAJNI W/O OKESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9385/2026 · 2026-06-19

Ravi Chirania V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23419] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 9385/2026 Rajni W/o Okesh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Binayaka, Tehsil-Pipalda, District Kota Rural, Currently Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Mau Borda, Panchayat Samiti Khanpur, District Jhalawar. (Presently In Central Jail, Kota, Raj.) ----applicant/accused Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----non-Applicant For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 19/06/2026 1. This misc. second bail application has been filed by the petitioner Rajni W/o Okesh, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.102/2026 dated 17.04.2026 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, District ACB District, for the offence punishable under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in the year 2018). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court with liberty to file afresh after filing of the charge-sheet, vide order dated 13.05.2026. Thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this second bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S, 2023. 3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. After investigation, charge-sheet has been [2026:RJ-JP:23419] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9385/2026] filed against the petitioner on 11.06.2026, no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner and the trial will take its considerable time. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application and perused the material available on record. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed, the petitioner is behind the bars since long and trial will take its considerable time, without commenting upon merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S., 2023. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Rajni W/o Okesh shall be released on bail, provided she executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse the liberty granted by this Court. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 223/RINCHU