Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8841 (RAJ)

BHUPESH S/O SHYAMLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8570/2026 · 2026-06-16

Bipin Gupta V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23263] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8570/2026 Bhupesh S/o Shyamlal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jatav Mohalla, Village Bhopur Shahpur, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa. (Accused Petitioner Confined At Central Jail Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Garg, Mr. Deepak Sharma, Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Order 16/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 22.05.2026, passed by the learned Session Judge, Dausa, District-Dausa, in Bail Application No.129/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No. EXC/DSA(1041)2026- 2027/009 registered at Police Station Excise Inspector Circle, District Dausa, for the offences under Sections 16/54, 54(A), 54(D) of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the FIR. He further submits that the allegation against the petitioner pertains to an offence under Sections 16/54 of the Excise Act. He also submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and has never been [2026:RJ-JP:23263] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8570/2026] involved in any offence of a similar nature or otherwise in the past. He further submits that the offences alleged are triable by the Magistrate and that the conclusion of the investigation/trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail, particularly in view of the fact that he has been in judicial custody since 15.05.2026. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and having considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as well as the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and has never been involved in any offence of a similar nature or otherwise in the past, the petitioner has been in custody since 15.05.2026, the offences alleged are triable by the learned Magistrate, and the conclusion of the investigation/trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time, this Court is of the opinion that the present bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be allowed. 6. 6. Consequently, the present bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner namely-Bhupesh S/o Shyamlal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 09/2026 registered at Police Station Excise Inspector Circle, District Dausa, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before [2026:RJ-JP:23263] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8570/2026] the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J Seema/66