Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8841 (AP)

RCHALAPATHI RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLRC/1253/2019 · 2026-08-23

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010404692019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.No.1 of 2019 In/And CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1253/2019 Between: 1. RCHALAPATHI RAO, S/O R RAGHAVULU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YRS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O H NO 20-23/4A, NAIDU BUILDINGS, CHITTOOR TOWN AND DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. K N YUVARAJ, S/O LATE K NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 62 YRS, R/O. H.NO 162, MALLERU VILLAGE, KALLUPALLI POST, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J M NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: I.A.No.1 of 2019 is filed for condoning the delay of 137 days in filing the Criminal Revision Case. No representation for the Petitioner. Even on the previous occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner, and no proof of service was filed. Despite the matter being posted under the caption ‘For Dismissal,’ there was again no representation for the Petitioner. There was no cause, let alone sufficient cause, shown by the Petitioner for filing the Revision Case with delay of 137 days. Therefore, I.A.No.1 of 2019 is dismissed for non-prosecution as the batta was not paid to Respondent No.2. In view of dismissal of I.A.No.1 of 2019, the Criminal Revision Case is also dismissed, as the delay is not condoned. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 24.08.2026 VTS