Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010120462026 2026:GAU-AS:9001 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2049/2026 SRI HARESWAR GOGOI SO LATE BHOIRABESWAR GOGOI, RO GAMES VILLAGE CAMPUS BLOCK A9, 103, LALMATI, BASISTHA, GHY, DIST KAMRUP M VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, GHY 06,DIST KAMRUP M, ASSAM 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-7. 3:THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMIN ) ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-07 KAMRUP METRO 4:THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (A) ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007. 5:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE GUWAHATI POLICE COMMISSIONERATE KAMRUP METRO 6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Page No.# 2/3 (ADMIN) GUWAHATI KAMRUP METRO 7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE GORCHUK POLICE STATION GARCHUK GUWAHATI KAMRUP METR Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORTHAKUR, MS. S KAKATI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 22.06.2026 Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the applicant, has submitted that in the order dated 25.05.2026 passed in WP(C) No.4286/2025, this Court had recorded as follows : “13. Accordingly, since it is admitted position that there is no criminal case pending before any of competent court of law and he has been exonerated in the departmental proceeding, the respondents shall take immediate steps to have the case of the petitioner considered by a Selection Committee, if necessary, and if not already considered, for promotion and give effect to the recommendation of the selection Committee for promoting the petitioner from the post of ASI (UB) to the post of ASI (UB). It is made clear that if the petitioner is afforded the promotions, the date of effect shall be such that he maintains seniority over his immediate junior in the Feeder cadre.” Page No.# 3/3 The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was required to be considered for the promotion to the post of SI(UB) and not ASI(UB). Mr. A. Chakravarty, learned counsel for all the respondents, has submitted that it would amount to correction of typographical error and he has no objection to the same. Accordingly, paragraph 13 of the order dated 25.05.2026 passed in WP(C) No.4286/2025 shall be read as follows : “13. Accordingly, since it is admitted position that there is no criminal case pending before any of competent court of law and he has been exonerated in the departmental proceeding, the respondents shall take immediate steps to have the case of the petitioner considered by a Selection Committee, if necessary, and if not already considered, for promotion and give effect to the recommendation of the selection Committee for promoting the petitioner from the post of ASI (UB) to the post of SI (UB). It is made clear that if the petitioner is afforded the promotions, the date of effect shall be such that he maintains seniority over his immediate junior in the Feeder cadre.” This order will be read as a part of the order dated 25.05.2026, passed in WP(C) No.4286/2025. I.A. is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant