Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8835 (JHR)

RAJA ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./12067/2025 · 2026-03-19

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7636 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 12067 of 2025 Raja Ansari, aged about 35 years, son of Md. Khalil Ansari, Resident of village-Jainagar, PO-Patratu, PS-Ramgarh, Dist.-Ramgarh, Jharkhand ... … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Niraj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Anand No. (2), Advocate Mr. Sapna Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, APP -------- Order No. 4 /Dated: 19th March 2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 387, 427, 120B IPC and under Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with S.T No. 149 of 2024 arising out Basal PS Case No. 02 of 2024 corresponding to G.R No. 594 of 2024. In this case, charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 387, 120B, 385, 307 IPC and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. It is submitted that there is allegation against the petitioner for firing two shots but no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and no Test Identification Parade has been conducted. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner’s name has transpired in the present case on the basis of confessional statement which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 04.09.2024 as such he may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner was not 2026:JHHC:7636 2 apprehended on the spot and no Test Identification Parade has been conducted in this case and the petitioner is lying in judicial custody since 04.09.2024, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Ramgarh in connection S.T No. 149 of 2024 arising out Basal PS Case No. 02 of 2024 corresponding to G.R No. 594 of 2024. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against the above-named petitioner, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the above-named petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands allowed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 19th March 2026 Amit Uploaded on 19/03/2026