Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 883 (RAJ)

VISHNU S/O HARVEER SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3113/2026 · 2026-03-19

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11754] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3113/2026 Vishnu S/o Harveer Singh, R/o Hayadpur Police Station Khoh District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 19/03/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 231/2024 registered at Police Station Khairthal District Khairthal Tijara for the offence(s) under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that applicant has falsely been implicated in the matter as the amount of money involved in the alleged offence has already been recov- ered. It is submitted that the said fact has also been reflected in the bail order of the co-accused-Aabid, who was granted the regu- lar bail vide order dated 06.09.2024, passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court. Lastly, it is submitted that the matter is tri- able by the Magistrate. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application and has submitted that there are as many as three criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant. [2026:RJ-JP:11754] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3113/2026] 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the amount of money involved in the alleged offence has already been recov- ered; that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail vide the order dated 06.09.2024, passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court; that the matter is triable by the Magistrate, and look- ing to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused- applicant subject to the condition that the accused-applicant joins investigation as and when called for. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Khairthal District Khairthal Tijara in F.I.R. No. 231/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Vishnu S/o Harveer Singh, he shall be released on bail, provided he/she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following condi- tions:- (i) that the applicant shall make himself avail- able for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indi- rectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India with- out previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /30