Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8827 (RAJ)

CHIRAG S/O JITENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6426/2026 · 2026-06-15

Bipin Gupta V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23192] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6426/2026 Chirag S/o Jitendra, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Chakchainpura, Police Station Man Town, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail At Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Singh Yadav, Mr. Tarun Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP. Mr. Naresh Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Order 15/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 18.04.2026, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, District-Sawai Madhopur, in Bail Application No. 338/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No. 132/2026 registered at Police Station Man Town, District-Sawai Madhopur, for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS,2023 and Sections 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only two complaints have been registered against the petitioner on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and that the amount involved is Rs. 43,000/-. He further submits that the conclusion of [2026:RJ-JP:23192] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6426/2026] trial is likely to take sufficient long time. He also submits that the offences are triable by a Magistrate and that the challan has already been filed. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail, as the accused has been in custody since 14.04.2026. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced as well as the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate, the amount involved is Rs.43,000/- only, the challan has already been filed, and there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the present bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be allowed. 6. Consequently, the present bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner namely-Chirag S/o Jitendra arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 132/2026 registered at Police Station Man Town, District-Sawai Madhopur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/ (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: [2026:RJ-JP:23192] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6426/2026] (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the prior permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected to have committed; (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing those facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J Seema/31