Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8827 (JHR)

SARBESHWAR HANSDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3457/2026 · 2026-04-27

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:12191 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3457 of 2026 Sarbeshwar Hansda, aged about 40 years, S/o Late Majuda Hansda … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Nilesh, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Advocate --- 02/27.04.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.10.2025 in connection with Tundi P.S. case No. 52 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 74, 75(2) BNS pending in the court of learned JM 1st Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it has been alleged in the First Information Report that the petitioner entered into the house of the victim and molested her but before anything further could happen, the victim raised alarm and the petitioner ran away from the place of occurrence. He has also submitted that the charge has been framed on 27.11.2025 but out of 6 charge sheeted witnesses, no witness were examined till 17.02.2026. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer. However, the aforesaid fact with regard to the manner of occurrence and the custody of the petitioner is not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the custody of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM 2026:JHHC:12191 2 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Tundi P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 27.04.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-28.04.2026