[2026:RJ-JP:23160] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8953/2026 Samay Singh S/o Shankar Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Naypur, Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. GA Mr. Anoop Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Order 12/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 02.06.2026 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur, in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 516/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioners was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No. 94/2026, Police Station Khandar, Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offence as alleged was committed in haste between the parties. There are cross FIRs and the injury was attributed to Kanhaiya, who has already been enlarged on bail. Both the injured person have entered into a compromise with the complainant. Therefore, [2026:RJ-JP:23160] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8953/2026] learned counsel submits that the petitioner may be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 3. Learned counsel for the complainant does not oppose the bail application and submits that if the anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, they have no objection. He also submits that the compromise has been entered between the parties. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case and considering the facts put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the overall facts and circumstances of the case specifically that the main accused to whom the injuries have been attributed, i.e. Kanhaiya has already been enlarged on bail and further considering the fact that both the injured namely Jugraj and Hemraj have entered into compromise and shown their inclination that the bail may be granted to the petitioner, this Court deems it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of petitioners, namely Samay Singh S/o Shankar Lal in connection with F.I.R. No. 94/2026, Police Station Khandar, Sawai Madhopur, shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the SHO/IO/Arresting [2026:RJ-JP:23160] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8953/2026] Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. (ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii) The petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Trial Court. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J VINAY/174