[2026:RJ-JP:23372] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8805/2026 1. Tulsiram S/o Johariram, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Dungapura, Police Station Balghat, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City, Karauli). 2. Gyan Singh S/o Shri Johariram, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Dungapura, Police Station Balghat, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City, Karauli). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chouhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 18/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioners Tulsiram S/o Johariram and Gyan Singh S/o Shri Johariram, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.167/2025 dated 07.07.2025 registered at Police Station Balghat, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 336(4), 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners are behind the bars for long and the allegations against them are that they committed illegality in respect of certain documents regarding their own land. He submits that it is not in dispute that the [2026:RJ-JP:23372] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8805/2026] petitioners are the owners of the land and, therefore, whatever illegality they have committed will not create any right in favour of the complainants to lodge FIR against them. Learned counsel further points to the age of the petitioners herein and submits that there is no apprehension of affecting the investigation, witnesses, etc., and in view thereof, he prays that the petitioners be enlarged on bail by this Court. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant strongly oppose the bail application, however, fail to dispute the fact that the petitioners herein are the owners of the land, in respect to which they made certain documents regarding mutation. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, age of the petitioners, the fact that they are the owners of the land in question and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court, is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners Tulsiram S/o Johariram and Gyan Singh S/o Shri Johariram shall be released on bail, provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. [2026:RJ-JP:23372] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8805/2026] 7. It is made clear that the observations as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 157/Dushyant