Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8822 (CHH)

SANTOSH KUMAR SORI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1800/2026 · 2026-02-16

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:8395 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1800 of 2026 • Santosh Kumar Sori S/o Kali Ram Sori Aged About 55 Years Principal (T- Cadre), Posted At Government Higher Secondary School, Sitagaon, Block Development Manpur, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of School Education Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. The Director Office Of Directorate Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, New Bhawan, New Raipur 3. District Education Officer District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki Chhattisgarh 4. Block Education Officer Block Manpur, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Gurudev I. Sharan, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 17/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue suitable direction to the respective concerned authority ie., Respondent No. 2 to decide pending representations as early as possible looking to the health issues of his father who is 80 years old person. 10.2 Any other relief, which may be deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court just and proper in the PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA Date: 2026.02.17 18:00:01 +0530 2 / 2 facts and circumstances of the case may also be provided in favour of the petitioner.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner against the order of posting on promotion has submitted representation before Respondent No. 2 on 10.10.2025, which till date is pending consideration and therefore direction to Respondent No. 2 be issued to consider and take decision on the pending representation at the earliest within specified time. 3. Learned State counsel submits that she is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. 4. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, nature of grievance raised, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing Respondent No. 2 to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a further period of 02 months from the date of receipt of copy of order passed by this Court. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE