Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8821 (CHH)

KHORBAHARA SINGH THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/102/2026 · 2026-02-03

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:CGHC:6145-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 102 of 2026 1 - Khorbahara Singh Thakur S/o Late Bisahuram Thakur Aged About 76 Years R/o Village - Tekari, Post - Mandar, Tehsil And District - Raipur, C.G. 2 - Ghasiya Singh Thakur S/o Late Bisahuram Thakur Aged About 66 Years R/o Village - Tekari, Post - Mandar, Tehsil And District - Raipur, C.G. ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Additional Collector - Raipur District - Raipur, C.G. 3 - Netram Thakur S/o Late Bisahuram Thakur Aged About 64 Years R/o Village - Tekari, Post - Mandar, Tehsil And District - Raipur, C.G. 4 - Narayan Thakur S/o Late Bisahuram Thakur Aged About 60 Years R/o Village - Tekari, Post - Mandar, Tehsil And District - Raipur, C.G. 5 - Peelaram Singh Thakur S/o Late Bisahu Ram Thakur Aged About 62 Years R/o Village - Tekari, Post - Mandar, Tehsil And District - Raipur, C.G. ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellants : Shri Shobhit Koshta, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Prasun Bhaduri, Dy AG For Private respondents : Shri Devershi Thakur, Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board Per R amesh Sinha, Chief Justice 04.02.2026 V PADMAVATHI Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2026.02.04 18:05:01 +0530 Wa 102 of 2026 2 Heard Shri Shobhit Koshta, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Shri Prasun Bhaduri, learned Dy AG, appearing for the respondent/State, and Shri Devershi Thakur, learned counsel for the private respondents. 1. Appellants have filed the present appel with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant appeal and the judgment dated 19.12.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in writ petition bearing WPC No.6600/25 be quashed and set-aside and allow the writ petition of the appellants/petitioners in the interest of justice.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants would submit that final order has been passed by the Court of Additional Collector, Raipur on 21.01.2026, in favour of the appellants herein, and the present appeal has become infructuous. 3. In view of above submission made by learned counsel for the appellants, present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice padma