[2026:RJ-JP:23277] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8509/2026 Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Bhut Bajheda Police Station Nadbai District Bharatpur At Present Resident Of Plot No. 110, Pawan Vihar, C.b.i. Phatak Ke Pass, Jagatpura, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City, District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaswant Persoya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 16/06/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh, aged about 53 years, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.107/2019 dated 20.02.2019 registered at Police Station Sadar Hindaun, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 466, 468 & 471 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the Additional Session Judge No.2, Hindaun City, District Karauli vide order dated 20.05.2026, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was working and posted as Bank Manager at Kheralu Branch, Mehsana Gujarat in [2026:RJ-JP:23277] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8509/2026] the complainant Bank and has been arrested by the Police in connection with the FIR No.107/2019 lodged by the Manager of the Bank at that time against certain persons, who took KCC loan by submitting forged documents related to the properties. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and further he faced the Departmental proceedings, in which no action was taken against him, as the Department failed to find anything against him. Learned counsel further submits that the other co-accused persons named in the FIR have already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court under Section 482 B.N.S.S. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application. 5. Be that as it may. 6. This Court is surprised to note that the FIR was lodged by Manager of the Bank in the year 2019 and the petitioner was not named in the FIR and he was free from the Departmental proceedings and even after that he was arrested by Police in the FIR in which he was not named. The conduct of the Department as well as Police Officials is not upto the mark. 7. This Court, after considering the nature of allegations, petitioner is behind the bars since long, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, the petitioner was not named in the FIR, the other co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court under Section 482 B.N.S.S. and after considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, is inclined to exercise its power under [2026:RJ-JP:23277] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8509/2026] Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. 7. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. 8. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 9. It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case within two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 42/Monika